|
|
 |
ASSOCIATION
TRADER TAX BENEFITS
GTT "virtual lobbying campaign" for "Trader
Tax Relief and Corrections"
Executive Summary
Updated August 2009. Our main concern is to
bring about tax relief for "traders in securities and commodities."
Over the last few years, Congress has passed many new laws that benefit
traders. Unfortunately, the IRS has done a poor job in translating those
new laws into IRS tax code, regulations and revenues procedures. As a
result, many traders have been unfairly penalized.
Congress passed beneficial tax laws for traders in 1997, allowing "qualified
traders" to elect "mark-to-market
accounting" (IRC 475 "MTM"). MTM accounting allows
traders to avoid the onerous "capital loss limitation" rules
($3,000 per year), "wash
sales" and "straddle rules."
Unfortunately for the majority of traders, Congress' promised tax relief
was "botched" by the IRS and their accountants. Without
MTM ordinary tax loss treatment, many traders have been forced out
of their trading businesses. During the market crash this past tax
year, far too many traders lost their trading capital and were unable
to replenish their trading accounts with net
operating loss tax refunds even though Congress intended
them to be entitled to it.
That is simply not fair, and it can easily be fixed with your help.
We need all traders and the media to get our message across to Congress
and the IRS. Please give us 15 minutes of your time to send our standard
e-mail to members of Congress and the IRS. If you are the media,
please publish our message. If you have any questions about our campaign,
please contact Robert A. Green, CPA, at rgreen@greencompany.com
Here is the problem and the solution in a nutshell:
MTM accounting is the default method of accounting for "dealers in
securities and commodities." In 1997, Congress recognized the growing
body of online traders and realized that "traders" were in a
business that was closer to dealers than "investors". Before
the 1997 tax law changes made things better for traders, specific, beneficial
tax rules only existed for dealers (IRC 475 MTM ordinary gain and
loss treatment) and investors (long-term capital gains benefits offset
by capital-loss limitations, wash sales and straddle rules). Traders don't
seek long-term capital gains rate benefits and they have tons of wash
sales and straddles, so why penalize them with tax rules for investors?
In our view, Congress made a mistake by requiring traders to elect
mark-to-market accounting. Why didn't Congress simply allow traders the
same treatment as dealers i.e., the ability to use MTM as the default
method of accounting, without the need for an election? Perhaps it was
because Congress was concerned about the vague definition of "trader"
vs. "investor." The IRS has done a poor job of actually defining
trader, and this has caused havoc for many traders and their accountants.
Most traders didn't even know there was a tax class for them, let alone
an election they had to make by April 15 of the current tax year.
Because of the above confusion, most traders missed the MTM election.
Many of these "cash basis" traders (i.e., those without
MTM) lost their entire trading capital. Since they cannot carry back
MTM net operating losses
for tax refunds, they have been forced out of business.
Congress can fix this problem simply by changing the "transition
rules" to allow all traders to use mark-to-market accounting, as
a "default" method, without an election. This relief for traders
will significantly increase the average trader's capital and bring fresh
capital back into these desperate financial markets.
By the way, commodity traders are already allowed to carry back their
trading losses three tax years, so it is onerous to securities traders
to not allow them this type of carry-back relief.
If you would like more information or to help us reach our advocacy
goals, kindly e-mail us at advocacy@greencompany.com.
|