|
EDUCATION CENTER Check out the new Mini 401K Plan. Heres a 2003 tax savings idea!
$13,632 tax-deductible contribution to your Mini 401(k) plan; $2,415 of deductible health insurance premiums. $1,237 one-half your SE taxes of $2,473 due on your $17,500 fee income.
www.americancentury.com/workshop/articles/max_contribution.jsp www.scudder.com/t/index.jhtml?content=/t/retirement/index.jhtml&document=scudderpersonalk.html http://page2.tdwaterhouse.com/faq/faqdefault.asp?type=indiv www.advest.com/individual/Individualk.htm
If you have any questions on retirement plans for traders, send us a confidential e-mail at info@greencompany.com or call us.
If you want to set up a GTT retirement plan along with a GTT Trader
Entity, purchase the below service:
After we form your entity and retirement plan, it is wise to engage
our firm to prepare your 2002 tax returns, to make sure you execute
this entire tax strategy correctly.
Types of retirement plans (RIA Client Letter) If you've recently started a business, you may be considering setting
up a qualified retirement plan for yourself and your employees. There
are several different types of plans that can qualify for the tax
advantages of a qualified plana current deduction from income
to the employer for contributions to the plan, tax-free buildup of
plan investments and the deferral of income (augmented by investment
earnings) to the employees until distribution of the funds. The type
of plan you choose will depend on your individual needs and circumstances.
© Copyright 2002 RIA. For a much more detailed overview of types of retirement plans, see 2002 tax law changes effecting retirement plans, see below. 2002 tax law changes effecting retirement plans. IRS
Publication 3998 (7-2002) New IRS pub describes retirement plan options for small businesses
(reprinted with permission from RIA) Benefits of starting a retirement plan. The pub notes that, by starting a retirement savings plans, a small business can help its employees save for the future, help the business attract and retain qualified employees, offer tax savings to the business, and help secure the business owner's own retirement. As the publication explains, a retirement plan has significant tax advantages including the following: contributions are deductible by the employer when contributed; Also, as IRS noted, recent tax law changes have provided additional incentives to start a retirement plan, including:
Plan choices. Small businesses may choose to offer IRAs, defined contribution (DC) plans, or defined benefit (DB) plans. Many financial institutions and pension practitioners make available one or more prototype retirement plans (i.e., 401(k) plans, profit-sharing plans, and money purchase plans) that have been pre-approved by IRS and can greatly lessen the administrative burden on employers. RIA observation: The pub includes a chart outlining the advantages of each of the most popular types of IRA-based and DC plans and an overview of a DB plan. See page 4 of the PDF file. Payroll-deduction IRAs. An employer can allow its employees to contribute to an IRA through payroll deductions. The decision about whether to contribute, and when and how much to contribute, to the IRA is made by the employee. Payroll deductions allow individuals to plan ahead and save each pay period, and are tax-deductible by an individual, to the same extent as other IRA contributions. The maximum annual contribution per participant is $3,000 for 20022004; $4,000 for 20052007; $5,000 for 2008. Additional contributions can be made by participants age 50 or over. Simplified employee pensions (SEPs). A SEP allows employers to set up a type of IRA for themselves and each of their employees. Employers must contribute a uniform percentage of pay for each eligible employee, although they do not have to make contributions every year. Also, the business owner can decide how much to put into a SEP each yearoffering flexibility when business conditions vary. Most employers can establish a SEP, which has low start-up and operating costs and can be established using a two-page form. The maximum annual contribution per participant is the lesser of 25% of compensation or $40,000. SIMPLE IRA plans. This savings option is for employers with 100 or fewer employees. A SIMPLE IRA plan allows employees to contribute a percentage of their salary each paycheck and requires employer contributions. Employers must either match employee contributions dollar for dollarup to 3% of an employee's compensationor make a fixed contribution of 2% of compensation for all eligible employees. SIMPLE IRA plans are set up by filling out a short form, and administrative costs are low. Employers may either have employees set up their own SIMPLE IRAs at a financial institution of their choice or have all SIMPLE IRAs maintained at one financial institution chosen by the employer. Employees can decide how and where the money will be invested, and keep their SIMPLE IRAs even when they change jobs. Employees can contribute up to $7,000 (for 2002) with $1,000 annual incremental increases until the limit reaches $10,000 in 2005. Additional contributions can be made by participants age 50 or over. The employer can either (a) match employee contributions 100% of first 3% of compensation (can be reduced to as low as 1% in any 2 out of 5 years); or (b) contribute 2% of each eligible employee's compensation. 401(k) plans. With a 401(k) plan, employees can choose to defer a portion of their salary. These deferrals go into a separate account for each employee. Generally, the deferrals (plus earnings) are not taxed by the federal government or by most state and local governments until distributed. 401(k) plans can vary significantly in their complexity. Employees can contribute $11,000 in 2002. This limit increases $1,000 each year until it reaches $15,000 in 2006. Additional contributions can be made by participants age 50 or over. The employer/employee combined contribution limit permits annual contributions per participant up to the lesser of 100% of compensation or $40,000. Employers can deduct their contributions up to 25% of aggregate compensation for all participants. Profit-sharing plans. Employer contributions to a profit-sharing plan are discretionary, and there is often no set amount that an employer needs to contribute each year. If an employer makes contributions, it needs a set formula for determining how the contributions are allocated among plan participants. The funds go into a separate account for each employee. Profit-sharing plans can vary greatly in their complexity. The maximum annual contribution per participant is the lesser of 25% of compensation or $40,000. Employers can deduct amounts that do not exceed 25% of aggregate compensation for all participants. Money purchase plans. Money purchase plans are DC plans that require fixed employer contributions, which are specified each year in the plan document. The maximum annual contribution per participant is the lesser of 25% of compensation or $40,000. Employer can deduct amounts that do not exceed 25% of aggregate compensation for all participants. Defined benefit plans. Defined benefit (DB) plans provide a fixed, pre-established benefit for employees. Employees often value the fixed benefit provided by this type of plan, and can often receive a greater benefit at retirement than under any other type of retirement plan. Also, businesses can generally contribute (and therefore deduct) more each year than in DC plans. However, DB plans are often more complex and, thus, more costly to establish and maintain than other types of plans. Contributions are actuarially determined. © Copyright 2002 RIA. All rights reserved. Mini 401(k) plan allows
some small business owners to maximize retirement plan contributionspart
1 Prior to the enactment of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA), it was unusual for a single-employee company to establish a Section 401(k) plan. This was due to the fact that the owner of a company, of which he or she was also the sole employee, could achieve the same benefits simply by establishing a company pay-all profit sharing plan. In addition, the small employer had other plan options that resulted in less administrative cost, such as a SEP. Where the employee received relatively modest compensation, a SIMPLE IRA would often prove a preferable alternative. As explained in this Practice Alert (Part one of two parts), changes resulting from the enactment of EGTRRA, however, have turned this analysis on its head. What is a Mini 401(k)? The advantages of such an arrangement have been significantly increased as a result of changes made by EGTRRA. These changes allow a Mini 401(k) plan to be established to maximize the contributions for owners and their family members employed by the business without the additional costs traditionally associated with plans maintained for the benefit of rank and file employees. Moreover, because they are anticipated to be free from the nondiscrimination testing that normally applies to Section 401(k) plans, Mini 401(k) plans can be drafted and administered much more simply and cost effectively. EGTRRA Changes Affecting the Decision Increase in the elective deferral limit. Prior to EGTRRA, the maximum amount that a participant could contribute for a calendar year on a before-tax basis to a Section 401(k) plan was based upon a base amount of $7,000. However, cost of living adjustments to this Code Sec. 402(g) limit had caused the base amount to increase to $10,500 for the calendar year beginning in 2001. Because increases were based upon cost of living adjustments, the limit had increased relatively slowly, with some years seeing no increase at all in the limit. Under EGTRRA, the elective deferral limit is $11,000 for tax years beginning in 2002 ($12,000 in 2003, $13,000 in 2004, $14,000 in 2005, and $15,000 in 2006 or thereafter). Once the limit reaches $15,000, it will subsequently increase based upon cost of living adjustments in multiples of $500. Moreover, this maximum deferral limit may itself be further increased by catch-up contributions. Participants who have attained age 50 before the close of a calendar year (or who are projected to do so) are allowed, post-EGTRRA, to make additional contributions under a Section 401(k) plan as catch-up contributions to help them to make up, in terms of their retirement savings, for those periods when the basic elective deferral limit is considered to have been unreasonably low. Catch-up contributions under Code Sec. 414(v) can be made by eligible participants as follows: $1,000 for years beginning in 2002, $2,000 for 2003, $3,000 for 2004, $4,000 for 2005, and $5,000 for 2006 or thereafter. This increased contribution can be made without running afoul of the Code Sec. 415 limit. Further, so long as a plan allows all similarly situated participants to make catch-up contributions, Code Sec. 414(v)(3)(B) provides that the additional contributions will not cause a plan to fail the actual deferral percentage test, that is, the special nondiscrimination test that applies to Section 401(k) plans. Due to these increases, an employee participating in a Section 401(k) plan can now contribute, on a before-tax basis, $12,000 in elective deferrals for 2003. Moreover, if that employee is at least age 50, he or she can contribute an additional $2,000, thus resulting in a total before-tax contribution of $14,000 for 2003. This is $5,000 more than the maximum before-tax contribution that can be made to a SIMPLE IRA for the same period (i.e., $8,000 in elective deferrals plus $1,000 in catch-up contributions for a total before-tax contribution limit of $9,000). Increase in the Code Sec. 415 limit. The second change that made establishing a Mini 401(k) plan more attractive was EGTRRA's increase in the overall maximum Code Sec. 415 limit. Effective for limitation years beginning in 2002 and thereafter, the maximum Code Sec. 415(c) limit, that is, the maximum amount of contributions from both the employer and the employee that can be made under an employer's defined contribution plans on behalf of a participant for a limitation year, increased from the pre-EGTRRA limit of the lesser of 25% of compensation or $30,000 (increased as a result of cost of living increases to $35,000), to the lesser of 100% of compensation or $40,000 (also scheduled to increase based upon cost of living increases). The increase in the maximum percentage limit from 25% to 100% has a significant potential impact on the establishment of a Mini 401(k) plan by those companies with only one employee where that employee is paid a relatively modest amount (i.e., under $40,000). This is because the sole employee-owner receiving annual compensation of less than $40,000 could receive a total aggregate contribution under a Mini 401(k) plan, taking into consideration both employee and employer contributions, of up to 100% of his or her before-tax compensation without running afoul of the Code Sec. 415 limit. GTT Observation: Code Sec. 415 changes above speak of 100 percent of compensation or $40,000 as the "maximum amount of contributions" to a plan each year. It is very important to note that "maximum amount of contributions" does not also mean the same amount is tax-deductible. The next section talks about Code Sec. 404 tax-deductible limitations, which rise to 25 percent of compensation or $40,000 under the new tax laws. So if compensation is $40,000, 100 percent of the $40,000 may be contributed to a defined contribution plan, but only 25 percent of that $40,000 $10,000 is deductible. The taxpayer gets a $10,000 deduction, but has the opportunity to benefit from tax-deferred portfolio income on those retirement assets. This writer talks about the tax-deferred growth opportunity with the term "increase in the maximum elective deferral limit" below. Changes to the deduction limit. The changes in the maximum Code Sec. 415(c) limit coupled with the increase in the maximum elective deferral limit might still not have been enough to justify the potential additional costs of establishing a single-person Section 401(k) plan, particularly, when compared with lesser cost alternatives such as the SIMPLE IRA, absent EGTRRA's changes to the deduction rules. Prior to EGTRRA, the maximum (tax) deductible contribution that a company could make to a profit sharing plan was limited to 15% of the total eligible compensation under the plan. This reflected the lowest deductible limit applicable to any tax qualified plan. However, EGTRRA amended Code Sec. 404(a)(3) to increase this limit to 25% of eligible compensation under the plan. Pursuant to the requirements of Code Sec. 401(k)(2) , a Section 401(k) plan must be part of an underlying profit sharing, stock bonus, rural cooperative, or pre-ERISA money purchase plan. Since the vast majority of Section 401(k) plans are part of an underlying profit sharing plan, the maximum deductible limit for such contributions has also increased, under EGTRRA, to 25% of aggregate participant compensation. In addition to increasing this maximum limit, however, EGTRRA made an additional change to the maximum deductible limit that has even more significance for Section 401(k) plans. Specifically, EGTRRA added Code Sec. 404(n) , which provides that elective deferrals will no longer count towards this 25% limit. Thus, an employer is free to make a 25% contribution to a Section 401(k) plan without regard to the level of elective deferrals contributed by the company's employees. These changes make the Section 401(k) plan more attractive to the small owner-only company, including those whose companies provide additional part-time income, particularly where the owners may receive compensation significantly less than the $200,000 maximum compensation limit under Code Sec. 401(a)(17) . Code Sec. 404(n) Elective deferrals not taken into account
for purposes of deduction limits. Advantages of the Mini 401(k) Plan RIA illustration : Leslie is the owner and sole employee of the ABC company. Leslie receives annual compensation from ABC of $20,000. Leslie would like ABC to establish a retirement plan and is considering both a company pay-all profit sharing plan and a profit sharing plan with a Section 401(k) feature. If ABC establishes a profit sharing plan without a Section 401(k) feature, the maximum deductible contribution that can be made to the plan is $5,000, that is, 25% of Leslie's compensation of $20,000. However, if the plan includes a Section 401(k) feature, that is, a Mini 401(k) plan, in addition to the $5,000 contribution from ABC, Leslie could contribute, for 2003, on a before-tax basis, up to $12,000. Leslie's before-tax contributions do not count towards the 25% deduction limit. The total contribution of $17,000 ($12,000 in before-tax contributions plus $5,000 of company contributions) do not exceed Leslie's Code Sec. 415 limit of $20,000 (that is, 100% of Leslie's compensation determined before the reduction for before-tax contributions). If Leslie is at least 50 years old, she could contribute, for the 2003 calendar year, an additional $2,000 of before-tax contributions as catch-up contributions. Since Leslie, the sole owner, and therefore a highly compensated employee under the rules of Code Sec. 414(q) , is the sole employee, the plan will automatically satisfy the coverage and nondiscrimination requirements that apply to Section 401(k) plans. If Leslie's goal is to maximize her retirement savings, the benefits of adding a Section 401(k) feature far outweigh the advantages of a company pay-all profit sharing plan, or a SEP or SIMPLE IRA. The illustration assumes that Leslie's sole occupation is running ABC. If Leslie were employed by another company that also maintained a 401(k) plan (and she is under age 50), her combined 2003 pre-tax contribution to both plans could not exceed $12,000. Pamela D. Perdue is of counsel to Summers, Compton, Wells & Hamburg in St. Louis, Missouri. She is the author of Qualified Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans, published by Warren, Gorham & Lamont. She is also the Chair of the ALI-ABA Fundamentals of Employee Benefits course. © Copyright 2002 RIA. All rights reserved. Mini 401(k) plan allows some small business
owners to maximize retirement plan contributionspart 2 Last week's Practice Alert explained the statutory changes that make the mini 401(k) plan a powerful retirement plan tool for smaller businesses. This week's Practice Alert carries part 2 of this article. It illustrates how the mini 401(k) plan can benefit a husband-and-wife team that runs a small business, and explains drafting and other issues that arise with such plans, including ERISA rules. It is not only the single-employee company that may benefit from the establishment of a Mini 401(k) plan. Couples may also find that such a plan makes sense in their retirement and tax planning. Prior to EGTRRA, many couples decided that only one spouse would be placed on the payroll of the family business. The other spouse might provide some benefits to the company, but not of a sufficient nature to justify a significant salary. For example, the other spouse might provide only part-time services. In such cases, it was often determined that the additional costs of such things as Medicare and Social Security taxes would far outweigh the relatively modest retirement benefit that could be accumulated with respect to a relatively modest salary where the Code Sec. 415 limits under a qualified plan would restrict the maximum contribution to 25% of compensation. Again, this decision may require rethinking as well due in significant part to the increase in the Code Sec. 415(c) percentage limit.
Employers considering the establishment of a Mini 401(k) plan will
likely wish to compare its benefits with the benefits that can be
gained from establishing a SEP, a SIMPLE IRA, or a company pay-all
profit sharing plan. The following table provides a breakdown, at
various compensation levels, of the maximum deductible contributions
that can be set aside under each plan type for the calendar year beginning
in 2003:
These figures do not include any catch-up contributions for eligible participants. Issues to Watch There is nothing in the governing guidance that precludes the maintenance of a Section 401(k) plan for a single employee. Moreover, Reg. § 1.401(k)-1(b)(2)(i) , in its flush language, specifically provides that an arrangement will not be deemed to fail to satisfy the coverage and nondiscrimination tests applicable to Section 401(k) plans merely because all eligible employees are highly compensated. Drafting and administrative issues. The Mini 401(k) plan will prove useful where a small employer has no non-highly compensated employees. The document is generally drafted with the assumption that the goal is to maximize contributions and that there will not be any eligible non-highly compensated employees. Further, the actual administration of the plan is likely to be established as a low cost turnkey approach requiring little, if any, professional administration and no nondiscrimination testing. However, care should be taken in both the drafting and the administration of the plan to deal with the potential that the business may grow and non-highly compensated employees may in fact one day become eligible to participate in the plan. Where the plan has been drafted to ensure maximum contributions, by such devices as a significant mandatory match, the employer will want to ensure that these issues are discussed, and that appropriate plan language is included, before any non-highly compensated employees become eligible. Otherwise, the employer may find itself obligated to make significant contributions for unanticipated participants. Other lawsincluding employer aggregation rules. Other rules that apply to traditional Section 401(k) plans continue to apply to a Mini 401(k) plan as well. This means, for example, that an employer that is part of a controlled or affiliated service group under Code Sec. 414(b) , (c), or (m) must continue to take into consideration employees of those related entities for purposes of determining whether the Mini 401(k) satisfies the applicable qualification requirements, including the minimum coverage requirements. Similarly, ERISA's plan assets rules apply to Mini 401(k) plans as well. Department of Labor regulations govern at what point participant before-tax contributions to a Section 401(k) plan become plan assets. At the point that they become plan assets, should they fail to be deposited in trust, the plan fiduciaries risk both a breach of fiduciary duty as well as a prohibited transaction. The regulations do not provide an exception for elective deferrals withheld from the pay of owners of the company and/or from their family members. Under Labor Reg. 2510.3-102 , employee contributions to a Section 401(k) plan become plan assets as of: the earliest date on which such contributions may reasonably be segregated from the employer's general assets, but in no event later than the 15th business day of the month following the month in which the contributions are received by the employer or, in the case of amounts withheld from wages, would otherwise have been payable to the participant. For a small plan (generally, a plan with fewer than 100 participants) with a single payroll system, the Department of Labor views these regulations as requiring the deposit of elective deferrals within days of the payroll (DOL auditors have stated, no more than seven days after the payroll). Summary Pamela D. Perdue is of counsel to Summers, Compton, Wells & Hamburg in St. Louis, Missouri. She is the author of Qualified Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans, published by Warren, Gorham & Lamont. She is also the Chair of the ALI-ABA Fundamentals of Employee Benefits course. © Copyright 2002 RIA. All rights reserved. How it works. Larger retirement plan deductions for self-employeds are created by the following changes, all effective for years beginning after 2001: (1)Elective deferrals (maximum of $11,000 for 2002) are no longer
subject to the deduction limit that applies to profit-sharing plans
(as well as salary-reduction SEPs). ( Code Sec. 404(n) ) Also, elective
deferrals aren't taken into account when figuring the amount that's
deductible for non-elective contributions. Example (1). John Doe works full time for an apparel company earning $70,000 a year. But he also works as a graphic artist on the side, producing logos, brochures and other corporate art-work for small businesses. For 2002, John's net earnings from self-employment (sideline income minus related business expenses, minus the deduction for one-half of self-employment taxes paid) is $10,000. If John has a combined profit-sharing and 401(k) (cash-or-deferred) arrangement, he can put away and deduct the entire $10,000 of net earnings, consisting of: (1)profit-sharing contribution (20% of $10,000 of net earnings from
self-employment) = $2,000. For federal income tax purposes, John's taxable income from the sideline business is thus reduced to zero. RIA observation: Keep in mind that annual maximum 401(k) deferral
amount ($11,000 for 2002) applies to all plans the taxpayer participates
in. Thus, if John makes an elective $8,000 contribution to a 401(k)
plan maintained by his full-time employer, the maximum he could put
away in his own plan would be $5,000 (regular profit-sharing contribution
of $2,000 plus $3,000 (which is the 401(k) overall dollar limit of
$11,0000 for 2002 less $8,000). (1)profit-sharing contribution (20% of $70,000 of net earnings from
self-employment = $14,000). As in the first example, keep in mind that annual maximum 401(k) deferral amount ($11,000 for 2002) applies to all plans the taxpayer participates in. Thus, if Mary also makes an elective $8,000 contribution to a 401(k) plan maintained by her day-job employer, the maximum she could put away in her own plan would be $17,000 (regular profit-sharing contribution of $14,000 plus $3,000 (which is the 401(k) overall dollar limit of $11,000 for 2002 less $8,000)). She could put away an extra $1,000 if she is age 50 or older. © Copyright 2003 RIA. All rights reserved. |